I have written an article about polarity in Buddhism in Czech and used Google Translate to get a decent English version. Of course, I corrected a few nonsense details, and I hope the result makes sense now. Although I could write a better version in better English, I hope it is sufficient for now.
When we study
and practice the Buddha's path, we sometimes tend to slip to some pole in
things that have two sides, without those sides being able to exist on their
own. I would like to outline a list (certainly incomplete) of such aspects of
the Path that are inherently incorrectly polarized by humans and why it is
important that we do not slip to just one pole.
Tradition
versus modern science
Buddha Gautama
lived about two and a half thousand years ago. Before he was born, various philosophers
and people lived in India who tried to achieve some ideal state through
practice. The Buddha followed the philosophy that was known in his time and
transcended it. He came up with his own philosophy and practice. But, of
course, we must realize that thanks to yogis, he learned to practice in the
lotus position, and thanks to Indian philosophy at the time, he had material
that he could transform, but he was based on that material. He also tried to
explain the psychology of man. Today's science knows much more about man, we
have much more accurate information about how the body, the nervous system, the
brain work ... but even modern science cannot explain everything yet. It cannot
explain how the brain works in all its details, it does not fully understand
human psychology, nor can it explain the origin or meaning of the universe. So,
on the one hand, we have traditional philosophy and practice - we are based on
the basic philosophy of how our ancestors understood the Buddha's teachings and
passed it on to this day. It is the transmission of tradition - philosophy and
practice. On the other hand, this philosophy was constantly subjected to new
trials and stimuli from those cultures where the Buddha's teachings spread. So
Buddhist philosophy is a living organism that still has the same basis, but is
constantly changing - without destroying its essential basis. Science can help
us understand how man behaves, how the body works, and how it relates to the
traditional philosophy of Buddhism and our practice of zazen. But science is
not omnipotent - we also need tradition. On the other hand, if we do not
understand that tradition is not a rigid bone, but a living organism, tradition
will be useless to us. To this day, some Christians claim that God created the
world in six days. What will a believing biologist, a believing mathematician,
say? Scientists who happen to believe in God claim that things like God creating
the world within seven days is a beautiful metaphor, but nonsense, from the
scientific point of view. Some Christians hate Pope Francis because he does not
condemn homosexuals. They insist that homosexuality is against human nature.
But Pope Francis refuses to ridicule his faith by ignoring facts confirmed by
science - so he respects the reality of the present world in its complexity and
he respects scientific knowledge. There are Buddhists in Asia who believe similar
nonsense – they insist that one cannot be a Buddha ... except after death. This
means that a tradition has stiffened and is not alive any more. This is the
death of religion. Once a living faith and living practice became convulsions
and unstoppable stupidity. Not to mention hatred ... However, we have to start
from something. We start from the fact that the Buddha practiced zazen and
taught how to attain the truth, ie how to become a real, true person. That
doesn't change. The means change - the appearance of the rooms where we
practice, what clothes we wear, what languages we express
ourselves ... it changes according to the culture in which the Path appears. We
must therefore find a balance between a tradition that needs to be valued and a
modern, contemporary approach - that is, we must present the tradition in a way
that is adequate for the present. What is essential? Zazen and the basic
teachings of dharma. People who want to pass on the original teachings of
Buddha must depend on the two pillars - practice of zazen and the basic teachings of
dharma. Those are the two pillars – practice and philosophy.
The universe
versus what is right in front of me
These are two poles where different people
tend to promote each other at the expense of the other. The universe means
something universal, so it is something we all have in common. (Latin universum
(“all things, as a whole, the universe”), neuter of universus (“all together,
whole, entire, collective, general, literally turned or combined into one”),
from uni-, combining form of unus (“One”) + versus (“turned.”) We all come, we all appeared in the background
of something universal, something that unites us all, so we all go back to the
One. Uni - one, versum - turned. The universe is space that applies to
everyone, to every being and to every thing. There is no world, there is not a
single grain of dust in the whole universe that can break free from the
universe. We people are mostly busy with our individual problems, we want to
solve our own lives, our own worries, our own pains, our own samadhi, our own
enlightenment ... but we forget that from the universe's point of view we are
no more than a random cell that appeared to disappear again in a moment.The
Buddha's teaching means that one person does not mean much, on the other hand, what
is right now - the moment in which we do something is the only tangible
expression of what is universal! So no universe exists without something really
manifesting here and now, it has shown. Here and now there is something
concrete, alive, but at the same time it is against the background of something
that is intangible, because it is completely universal. When we say that nothing
matters, because we are basically just dust and transience, we must not forget
the second opposite - we are also a concrete form that has appeared in the
universe. Except for man, all beings and things in the universe are always in
harmony with the truth. They never act out of reality. Only man has lost the
ability to remain naturally in harmony with the universe because of his
complicated thinking. Therefore, it is our task to return to the core of things
and to express and behave in such a way that it is in accordance with the order
of the universe. But one cannot exist without the other. When I forget about
myself, I remember having to do something for another person. But when I help
others with the idea that I am an exclusive, good person, I lose touch with my
origins, I forget that everyone is basically good, and I very quickly become a
scumbag. When we rely only on ourselves, sooner or later we will be exhausted
because we are not drawing energy and wisdom from the universe. But if we only
cling to the fact that everything is One and try to attain some states of samadhi
without also taking care of the bills, cooking, cleaning, neighbors and their
well-being, then we are just a spiritual kind of selfish person. So neither
clinging to the universe nor forgetting our origins. A fish that wants to deny
that it is part of the ocean would be a fool. But a fish that would try to
dissolve in the endless waters of the ocean so that it wouldn't have problems
would be the biggest fool in the entire ocean. When we practice zazen, there is
naturally a balance between being initially empty and universal, without
special qualities or opinions - and being specific people with a particular
body and sitting in some particular position - so we are living buddhas,
manifesting awakening in such a way that that we return this particular body to
its origin without killing it - that's why we can sometimes move easily, we can
scratch our noses ... So there is a balance between what is perfect and
incomparably deep, and what is our imperfect, a crooked but completely true body.
Satori versus illusion
Some people think that
when they reach the satori, they will understand everything and nothing will
deceive them. I do not know of any master in Zen history who claims to have
overcome his or her delusions. But especially in Master Dogen's tradition, in
our line, the emphasis is not on removing delusions, but on clearly seeing that
thoughts arise in our minds that are not reality but mere delusions. We have to
see that. On the one hand, there is an unhealthy desire for enlightenment - on
the other hand, there is an unhealthy laziness. Just because someone has read
somewhere that delusions do not need to be destroyed does not mean that we
will not try to awaken to reality in the midst of delusions. The teachings of
the old masters and the practice of zazen remind us again and again where we
confused a painted cake with a real cake. At any moment, we have the
opportunity to replace delusions with reality - instead of thinking, just go
and make coffee, or get dressed, or sweep the floor. We do not need any satori
for this, on the contrary, such action is living satori, that is, satori that
we should be concerned with - not solving our delusions and enlightenment, but acting awakened -
instead of analyzing what dust consists of wipe this dust. Instead of
discussing enlightenment, implement this enlightenment in a specific action
here and now. So waking up is important - but only if that's what we're doing
at the moment. Awakening that does not concern this moment is an unnecessary dream.
Satori, which does not directly concern us at this time when we do not have
time to think about satori, is living satori. When we forget our opinions, we
can notice that nature has perfect satori at every moment. So when we are as
real as nature, we will live an awakened life. Awakened life means - because I
realize that I basically know nothing and that I create nonsense most of the
time, I prefer to go and make tea. This is an awakened life.
Effort and casualness
We can't try to land on
Mars tomorrow. But today, at this point, we can take the first small step on
the way to Mars. Kodo Sawaki said of himself that in his youth he tried to
train harder than his companions and that he tried his best to achieve satori.
When he became wise in time, he realized that this was not the way. We wake up
in the morning and practice zazen. That in itself is a pretty big effort.
Further effort is useless, even harmful. Today we can only do what we can do
today. And when we do what we do today sincerely and honestly, we have already achieved
our greatest goal - we have become a true part of the universe. On the other
hand, when we put it off or say that it is enough to practice lying down or
once a year, we do not understand how important it is to devote our hearts
every day to practice, the spirit of dharma. Every day is a festival of dharma.
If you are a Christian, you may not be interested in dharma, but you can
experience dialogue with God every day. This means that you are sincerely
trying - it is not about the results, but about how open your heart is, which
is reflected in your dealings with other people and the like. However, back to
the Buddha - which day do we want to express the truth of the Buddha's
teachings than if not today? Which zazen expresses the Buddha's awakening if not
the one we are practicing? We can only try at this moment. We can't try
tomorrow, we couldn't try yesterday, it's too late. Only at this moment do
things happen. If we have faith in the Buddha's dharma, we must realize that
dharma is something that is practiced right now. Sometimes we meet at retreats - to remember what we may have
forgotten - the teacher can remind us why we practice and what we practice.
When we practice with others, our delusions - which we do not see when we are
alone - can become clear. I remember that ät my first Zen retreats, almost everyone got on my
nerves. And I was annoyed by sutras and the exact way of eating and handling
bowls. Korean names for everything got on my nerves. In a few years, I stopped
caring, but the master got on my nerves. Later I found a better teacher. He didn't
get on my nerves, but I was afraid of him. When you do not come into contact
with the teacher, you will not find out what is haunting your head. Is it good
to have all sorts of problems and disputes with the teacher - this is a test of
your authenticity - are you willing to admit that you are dreaming about
yourself or your teacher? A teacher is definitely an ordinary person who tries
to live every day over again. That does not mean that he or she never fails.
Anyway, each moment is a new chance to do something good.
Knowledge versus the
wisdom of the child
There are people who
think that they cannot practice the Way unless they know all the sutras,
understand the meaning of all Indian and Japanese Buddhist terms, know
calligraphy, be proficient in the tea ceremony, etc. This is great nonsense. We
need to have some sort of overview of the basic teachings, but if we confuse
the Buddha's teachings with an academic degree, we are completely off the mark.
Gautama spoke all the words with a desire for his disciples to be able to
become themselves - to be as clean as an unwritten sheet of paper, to be
spontaneous and true as a three-year-old girl. Master Dogen exhorts us to respect
every being who expresses the truth, because such a being is a true Zen
master, be it a seven-year-old girl, or a fox or a stone wall. Yes, even walls
and paths and mountains are beings, they are living beings because they are a
living system that changes dynamically just like everything that has appeared
in the cosmos. So we should study the words of the old masters so that we can
break free from the words of the old masters and thus express for ourselves
what is true and alive. So let's study with an open mind, let's not draw any
intellectual conclusions, but rather make sure you aren’t late for
work. And we can always laugh at ourselves and our stupidity.
Mystery versus
recognition
The Buddha's
teaching does not celebrate mystery, in other words Buddha does not claim that
we cannot find the truth, nor does it confirm that the truth can be found
through reasoning. Still, although we cannot find the truth thanks to
reasoning, we can still be a true person. However, the truth, as taught to the
Buddhas, will always be impossible to attain through reason. In Czech we say “My
reason got stuck as for that.” How do you say that in English? "I am totally baffled"? When Buddha turned a flower in his fingers to
show clearly what his teachings are, no one understood, only Mahakashyapa
smiled. That makes us baffled, we might say. What does turning a flower in your
fingers mean? What secret did the Buddha hide from us? And what did
Mahakashyapa hide from us when he smiled? The two must have been whispering
before this famous meeting took place. But Gautama did not hide anything from
anyone! He just turned the flower in his fingers! Where is anything hidden
here? And Mahakasjapa did not hide anything either – as Buddha’s turning a flower in his fingers amused him, he
smiled. When you tickle the baby on the leg, she starts laughing. If you don't feedd
her for a long time, she'll start crying. Where is any secret? Where is the
mystery? However, our reason would like to define it somehow, it would like to
find some tangible, measurable proof of "truth." Some people say they
don't believe in God because God just can't be proven. And at the same time,
people who are mathematicians or physicists, for example, say that they do not
believe in a God that should be proved - they believe in a God who is
mysterious, far from reason ... At the same time, they have a kind of intimate
relationship with this God. So we, if we are interested in dharma, we can have
a vivid dialog with and experience an intimate relationship with flowers,
children, winter, spring, wind, frost,
sun, water ... We can believe that in every single living unit of the cosmos
there is hidden secret, the truth. We can keep this secret a secret and enjoy
how it manifests itself beautifully to us, as it is shown to us at individual
moments of the day. A believer perceives God as shown to her in various
manifestations of nature or daily life, or in other people ... If we are
interested in the teachings of the Buddha, we must understand that the dharma
that the Buddha taught is not something that can be scientifically described.
But it is something that can be practiced, sensed, cultivated, perceived,
honored, protected, awakened in oneself. We don't have to understand
everything. It's enough that it's here alive and kicking.